Saturday, March 27, 2010

Halo Spartan Helmet Diagram

The director of marriages

The light returns and Marco Bellocchio, accompanied by John A. Gili, speaks to the public face of cinema Jean Vigo. The meeting was enthusiastic and seems to be even more impressed by the prestige of the filmmaker. Must be added before its projection in Nice, director Wedding had already been presented at Cannes 2006 in the section "Un Certain Regard." We had the impression that evening, to attend some sort of event (amplified by the problems faced by the film distribution in France). The speeches, all favorable, succeed - even if the relevance is not necessarily mandatory. A spectator shows some reservations. The latter said they had not seen the same film as the others. For him, it is a mere exercise in style. The director, always charming, defends his film. Although not entirely agree with either intervention, one can nevertheless wonder about the intentions of Bellocchio.
It adopts an eclectic approach based on multiplication of improbable situations and a mounting always looking for break. It is the filmmaker's challenge. He wants to surprise the viewer at all costs, for a fantasy and outspokenness that renews each sequence. If inspiration does not fault him, he still manages a time when the will to break the rational structure of the film becomes indigestible. It's stifling, overwhelmed by an incredible procession of scenes, which do not, according to the author, at least formally free. While it is primarily interested in the path - to say the least confusing - the characters. But in fact we are so absorbed by the refusal of any realism that one gradually forgets to look for the narrative coherence of the work. The story is simple. Franco Elica, a famous director, was hired by Prince Ferdinando Gravina di Palagonia to film the wedding of his daughter. The protagonist falls inevitably love with the princess and tries to prevent this union. On this point, we can still congratulate Bellocchio, who reinvented the structure of the tale that explores a new way desire infantilism of his contemporaries, so conveyed in the cinemas. Witness the tragic success, with adults, Harry Potter and company. Overload plaguing the film is all the more regrettable.
The director said that Sicily was treated as an image of the "South" and not in its specificity Regional. It's a surprise, as the movie seems to refer to precisely what characterizes the best in film and literature. The dilapidated, immobility, religiosity. This is not only the world southern Sicily is primarily spoken of Lampedusa, or Roberto Sciascia. The sociopolitical context of the country is also viewed through the prism of Sicily. The players keep saying that it is the dead who order in Italy. The Prince of Salina it not evoked, through other metaphors, this old age and gravity in this The cheetah ? The representation of the island does not seem so vague - not counting the extracts Cavaleria rusticana and all the social imagination that contains Mascagni's opera.
Bellocchio was that, unlike the new wave of filmmakers, he does not "talk about the movie theater." The idea is amazing considering some sequences that involve a reflection on the value of a filmmaker, the manifestation of creativity (see plans in black and white, which represent the images turn Elica unconsciously), or its place in the process of developing a work. In addition, Bellocchio said not to include quotes from movies, unlike Godard. But no one notices it does not, for example, the music of Leaves that movie fans immediately associate with doors at night ? It is not strictly a quote, but the reference (even unintentional) is still present. Not to mention the evocation of Cheetah in dialogue, or the repeated use of Cavaleria rusticana that so many filmmakers have taken before. This whole film thickness would be fortuitous? Would it not put into perspective the film in the cinema? No, really, we have not seen the same movie!


Aurélien Portelli


Monday, March 22, 2010

Can You Put Cash Welcome On Wedding

The mask of the devil: the aesthetics of morbid Bava

the seventeenth century, Moldova, the witch Asa Vajda Igor and his lover are accused of vampirism. Before burning them alive, the executioner pulled down over their faces a mask with sharp spikes. About to die, Asa launches a curse on his descendants. Two centuries have passed. Dr. Krujavan, assisted by his disciple Andrei, accidentally awakens the witch. Prince Vajda dreads the fulfillment of the curse, while his daughter, Princess Katia, is the perfect portrait of the witch. The mask of the demon (made in 1960 based on a story by Gogol), is the first film by Mario Bava. Already known for his work as director of photography in Italy, where he signed a work of great visual richness, which opens a long and distinguished career as a director, whose style has profoundly influenced the Seventh Art, and in particular the cinema horror.

A captivating aesthetics
The first sequence, which shows the execution of the two worshipers of the devil, immediately plunges us into a fascinating plastic construction. The macabre atmosphere that emanates plans - the misty layers of winter and Moldavian folk load generated by this place, the hooded executioners who carry out their grisly task, tracking shots on the skinny branches of trees, the mask that s' driven into the flesh of Asa - is beautifully rendered in black and white photography of Bava. While the film sometimes suffers from some imperfections. Some connections are botched. The special effects are not of equal quality. The narration and tramples the psychology of characters can not escape the great archetypes of the genre. But these weaknesses are largely offset by a bewitching aesthetic vision. Bava uses his experience as a head carrier and a talented artist. For example, the difficulty level of the puppet shake a bat attacking Krujavan, the filmmaker decides to throw the menacing shadow of the creature on the walls of the crypt. This choice gives strength to the expressionistic sequence and allows the same opportunity to forget the weakness of trickery.
The sets (designed by Giorgio Giovannini), in addition to being beautifully filmed, particularly vivid. On this point, we find no false notes. The walls of the cave-ridden centuries, the predominance of Gothic architecture, the gates decayed badly greased the cobwebs, the dilapidated castle and furniture dusty prince (remnants of the bygone glory of his dynasty) suggest a whiff of embalming livid in these places, where death seems to prevail at all times.
The preponderance of nighttime sequences, found in most horror movies, almost becomes a pretext for Bava to test his mastery of chiaroscuro, with the Like the great Baroque artists. The lighting effects are particularly complex and results. An outdoor scene, a stunning beauty, reveals the walls of the castle which stands out in the dark when the clouds away to reveal a full-moon triumphant. Light caresses of the sun low on the left side of the frame and enhances the threatening aspect of the monolithic mass, which focuses the bulk of the plot.
The slowness of certain camera movements evokes the slow, inexorable march that led life to death. The mask of the demon , because of its narrative substance and form, is an ode to nothingness. Bava also uses distorting temporal Igor returned from the beyond, leads the coach must return to the Krujavan dying prince. The race is filmed in slow motion and horses - almost ghostly vision - seem straight out of hell. Bava also uses other techniques just as effective. Speed optical tracking shots front and rear staging boosts and strengthens the terror felt by the viewer. For example the zoom on the frozen face of Igor, who advances to the prince in order to assassinate him, echoes the abominable traits of the protagonist.
Some frames, especially in the first part, express the gravity of evil that emanates from the film. While Krujavan and Andrei through the estate of Prince, we see that the camera is placed behind the crooked branches, which cover almost the entire frame. Bavarian landscape just a small opening between the branches, which allows the viewer to see the carriage away into the background. The plan suggests that the characters enter a death trap, they can not escape. The same idea is suggested when the two characters move toward the crypt and pass under an arch. We note that the frame is slightly tilted. Bava said that Andrei Krujavan and enter a place governed by evil forces, which impose new rules to reality.
The style adopted by Bava works in depth the material of the film Twilight Murnau ( Nosferatu , 1922), Browning ( Dracula , 1931), Dreyer ( Vampyr , 1932) and Halperin ( White Zombie , 1932). But if one feels cast the decisive influence of the great masters of terror, we also note several innovative features that make Mask of demon one of the first horror movies Modern (1) .
The filmmaker dusts off the genre by changing some codes inherent in particular vampire movies. Humans must not drive a pile in the heart but in the left eye of monsters to destroy. The sequences where the blood spurting profusely gives Mask of demon texture gore as refined fresh ideas, thus imposing new designs on the narrative and aesthetic (2) . The scenes where Asa's face gradually restores are very impressive. A swarm infamous anime first orbits of the dead, while in another plane, white globes start to form.
Other elements, however, brings us fully into the tradition of in this genre. The creatures must feed on blood. They are endowed with powers hypnotics and fear the crucifix, holy pictures, fire and light. Overall, Bava takes over the characteristics of the imaginary vampire (from Dracula Stocker to horror movies). The demon mask expresses both rupture and continuity.

The theme of the dual key to interpreting the film
The prince is obsessed with the portrait of Asa and Igor, who belong to his family for two centuries. One night the old aristocrat believes perceive a change in the griffin painted in the second table. The animal was alive before, seems to be dead. The obsession becomes terror. The representation of vampires is twofold: it is both pictorial and is resurrected figure. The portrait captures symbolically dead, while witchcraft allows them to actually win eternity.
haunted Shades, reflecting the pattern in a glass of wine, ominous shadows on the walls, the image of the witch cleverly introduced by a fade when Krujavan throws a stone in water: death is first projection before incarnation. It invades the mind before attacking the body.
Princess Katie is the perfect lookalike of Asa. It draws its vital energy that the witch will be able to relive. Death feeds on life by attacking the integrity of the flesh. Symptoms of the curse are always the same: victims are disfigured, as the vampires are the scars on their face mask of the devil. Pass away the living and the dead back to life. Gradually, vampires regenerate and regain a normal appearance. Asa plants his fingernails into the arm of Katie to begin the transfer of energy. Once his flesh will be totally reconstituted, the witch can take the place of his double in the world. Death is triumphant. It dominates life to the point of the exploit. Asa, born to Katie is only the cook of the beyond. The body of the princess is no longer an object of flesh to strip a carcass in the making.
Also, Katia's candor, his angelic face, her milky skin, her cleavage, can bring a touch of light in a world so obscure, for it carries the genes that predetermine a gruesome end. It is also won by the sadness and renunciation, because it senses the danger that threatens it. After the death of her father, Katie does not believe in life and realizes his own degeneration - she looks at her reflection in the water and realizes that her beauty fades every day. Death conquers all vanities. This idea is suggested when Bava films, twice, put on a skull the edge of a niche of the crypt. Recall that the skull refers often in the iconography Baroque to the motto "Memento mori", which is, according to Barbara Borngässer, "the leitmotif of a disordered society, haunted by angst . The author adds that "The theme of Vanitas, none of earthly existence, through all the arts" (3) . can easily recognize the timeless value of this theme, very present in Bava's filmography ( body and whip , The house of exorcism , The Girl Who Knew Too , etc..). The happy ending is in fact a subterfuge and expresses a total nihilism. The plans are foiled the witch and burnt at the stake. The vampire woman returns to death. Katie, meanwhile, returns to life effectively disappears when the double but this is only a reprieve. Her beauty will continue to wither and turn it once again become dust.
Bava's aesthetic perfectly describes the purity of death. And it is this purity that ultimately becomes an object of fascination, direct response to this morbid instinct in every man - the witch doctor Krujavan attracts by offering him a kiss, while she still bears the marks caused by hideous mask. The viewer, like the doctor, can hardly escape this mechanism of seduction. He ended up being totally subservient to process film, as if trapped in a table as wonderful as terrifying.
Aurélien Portelli

__________
(1) For Eric Dufour, " Bava's not for nothing, except the initiator, at least the forerunner of what is called the horror film " . See E. DUFOUR, The horror film and its figures, Paris, PUF, 2006, p. 22
(2) Eric Dufour adds that Bava has developed a code that has structured the narrative genre: "in a film horror, the fact that history is not essential to the result that the final revelation of the murderer is also important that the development of some elements of a plot, however implementation (...). What matters is mostly all the times when nothing happens, so that the film is first and foremost an accumulation of signs, whereby it is possible that something happens, without being seen elsewhere or here, now or later " . See E. DUFOUR, The horror film and its figures, op. cit.
(3) Rolf TOMAN (book edited by), Baroque and Rococo , Berlin, Editions Feierabend, 2003, p. 202.

THE MASK OF DEMON (La Maschera LED Demonio)
Director: Mario Bava . Screenplay: Ennio De Concini, Mario Serandrei (after Gogol). Photo: Mario Bava . Interpretation: Barbara Steele, John Richardson, Andrea Checchi, Ivo Garrani. Genre: Horror ( Italy, 1961, 87 min. ).